TEXAS CRIMINAL PATTERN JURY CHARGES

Copyright Information

The State Bar of Texas, through its Texas Bar Books Department, publishes practice books prepared and edited by knowledgeable authors to give practicing lawyers as much assistance as possible. The competence of the authors ensures outstanding professional products, but, of course, neither the State Bar of Texas, the editors, nor the authors make either express or implied warranties in regard to their use. Each lawyer must depend on his or her own knowledge of the law and expertise in the use or modification of these materials

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that (1) this written material was not intended or written by the author(s) to be used for the purpose of avoiding federal penalties that may be imposed on a taxpayer; (2) this written material cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer; (3) this written material cannot be used in promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related transaction or matter; and (4) a taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

The use of the masculine gender in parts of this manual is purely for literary convenience and should, of course, be understood to include the feminine gender as well.

International Standard Book Number: 978-1-956363-19-7

© 2009-2016, 2018-2020, 2022 State Bar of Texas

Austin, Texas 78711

All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted for the copying of any part of this publication by a photocopy or other similar process or by manual transcription, by or under the direction of licensed attorneys for use in the practice of law. No other use is permitted that will infringe the copyright without the express written consent of the State Bar of Texas.

This book contains material previously published in Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges—Criminal Defenses, Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges—General, Evidentiary & Ancillary Instructions, Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges—Intoxication, Controlled Substance & Public Order Offenses, Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges—Crimes against Persons & Property, Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges--Defenses, Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges--Intoxication and Controlled Substances, Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges--Preparatory Crimes, Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges--Crimes against Persons, and Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges--Property Crimes

Committee on Pattern Jury Charges—Criminal

2021-2022

Emily Johnson-Liu and James Gerard McDermott II, Co-Chairs

John R. Messinger, Vice-Chair

Wendell A. Odom, Jr., Chair Emeritus

Hon. Kevin Yeary, Court of Criminal Appeals Liaison

Committee on Pattern Jury Charges—Oversight

2021-2022

Hon. Daniel E. Hinde, Chair

Hon. Ana Estevez, Vice-Chair

Hon. John P. Devine, Supreme Court Liaison

Committee on Pattern Jury Charges—Criminal

2008-2022

Chairs

Alan Lee Levy, 2008-2014

George Dix, 2014-2016

Wendell A. Odom, Jr., 2016-2021

Emily Johnson-Liu and James Gerard McDermott II, 2021-2022

Vice-Chairs

George Dix, 2008-2014

Wendell A. Odom, Jr., 2014-2016

Emily Johnson-Liu, 2016-2021

John R. Messinger, 2021-2022

Court of Criminal Appeals Liaison

Hon. Cathy Cochran, 2008-2014

Hon. Kevin Yeary, 2016-2022

Members

State Bar of Texas

2022-2023

Laura Gibson, President

Chad Baruch, Chair of the Board

Dwight McDonald, Chair, Board Professional Development Subcommittee

Scott Rothenberg, Chair, Committee on Continuing Legal Education

Trey Apffel, Executive Director

Texas Bar Books

Sharon Sandle, Director

Elma E. Garcia, Assistant Director

James W. Norman, Project Publications Attorney

Nicholas B. Goddard, Publications Attorney

Susannah R. Mills, Publications Attorney

Derek Smith, Publications Attorney

Roger Siebert, Senior Editor

Courtney Cavaliere, Editor

Eizabeth Floreani, Editor

Edward Morgan, Operations Manager

Travis Riddle, Production Supervisor

Jennifer Townsend, Production and Editorial Assistant

Cynthia Day, Meeting Coordinator

Lara Talkington, Marketing Coordinator

Kevin Henderson II, Website Manager

Jennifer Karlsson, Web Content Specialist

Jennifer Perez, Web Content Specialist

Lenila Carreno, Accounting Specialist

Preface

The Pattern Jury Charges Committee—Criminal was first formed in 2005 with the goal of drafting criminal instructions in plain language. The Committee was challenged with addressing both the need to state the law in statutory terms and the need to provide charges in language juries could understand. To this end, the Committee designed an outline for the charges that explicitly states the relevant statutes and legal definitions and then applies the law to the facts in commonsense language. Each section is clearly identified, and the format was designed to enhance readability for the jury.

Once this template was developed, the Committee drafted the first volume: Texas Criminal Pattern Jury Charges—Intoxication and Controlled Substances. The Committee was then able to produce four more volumes at a rapid pace. In 2015, the series was expanded and reorganized for greater utility and room for further expansion.

In 2020, the Committee revisited the template it initially adopted. Importantly, it renewed its commitment to using a format and language that enhance juror understanding. It continued what it believed were the Committee’s most significant contributions—its culpable mental state definitions (tailored to a specific element, not a category like “result” or “circumstances”) and the numbered list of elements in its application of law to facts unit. Based on the advice of highly experienced members, judges, and other practitioners, the Committee also streamlined the charge template. In particular, it eliminated the potential confusion that might occur from conveying the elements of the offense in several different ways throughout the charge, notably in its accusation and relevant statutes units. The result is shorter and less repetitive instructions for the jury. And in 2022, with technical support and implementation by Texas Bar Books, the pattern charges moved to a fully online format—with the aim of providing even greater functionality and ease of use.

As with the initial set of volumes, the Committee still provides in its commentary a significant amount of material on the underlying law to aid practitioners in using the charges. This varies from the style of the civil charges. But precisely because the Committee’s approach is significantly different from that of more traditional criminal charges, the Committee felt it was important to ensure the attorney had all the information needed to use the charges with confidence.

This work could not have been completed without the commitment, dedication, and experience of many Committee members, both past and present. These members have volunteered their time to read hundreds of pages before meetings and participated in hours of (sometimes contentious) discussion so that the pattern charges will be both balanced and accurate. They have volunteered to keep sections of our materials up to date with case law and legislative changes, and a particularly dedicated group of members have also drafted charges on the Committee’s behalf. The Committee is especially indebted to Professor George Dix, who made this jury charge project possible in the first place and whose contributions and leadership continued to sustain it for more than a decade. The Committee is also grateful to Judge Kevin Yeary for his long-time support as a liaison to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, to the numerous other lawyers and judges who have offered ideas for improvement, and to the staff of Texas Bar Books, who provide the careful editing and other invaluable assistance that have made this online publication a reality.

—Emily Johnson-Liu and James McDermott, Co-Chairs

Introduction

1. Purpose of Publication

   
   

   The purpose of this product is to assist the bench and bar in preparing the court's charge in jury cases. It provides general instructions for the guilt/innocence stage of the trial and instructions covering the most commonly used offenses and defenses. The jury instructions are suggestions and guides to be used by a trial court if they are applicable and proper in a specific case. Of course, the exercise of professional judgment by the attorneys and the judge is necessary in every case.

2. Scope of Pattern Charges

   
   

   A charge should conform to the pleadings and evidence of the particular case. Occasions will arise for the use of instructions not specifically addressed herein. Even for the specific instructions that are addressed in this product, trial judges and practitioners should recognize that the Committee may have erred in its perceptions and that its recommendations may be affected by future appellate decisions and statutory changes.

3. Principles of Style

   
   

   1. Basic philosophy. This product embodies the Committee's recommendation that several basic and reasonable changes can and should be made to how juries are instructed in criminal trials. Although they are the result of long and careful consideration by members drawn from the bench, prosecutors' offices, defense practice, and academia, the jury instructions in this product have no official status. Appellate courts are unlikely to regard trial judges' refusal to use the Committee's jury instructions as reversible error. These instructions will be used, then, only if trial judges are willing to exercise their considerable discretion to adopt them in particular cases.

   
   

   2. Simplicity. Criminal litigation by its nature often raises difficult questions for juries to resolve. Compound that difficulty with the current practice of drafting instructions almost verbatim from the statutes, occasionally inherently ambiguous themselves, and an onerous task lies ahead of juries. The Committee concluded that plain language in criminal jury instructions is both desirable and permissible and has therefore sought to be as brief as possible and to use language that is simple and easy to understand.

   
   

   3. Bracketed material. Several types of bracketed material appear in the jury instructions. In a bracketed statement such as “[indictment/information],” the user must choose between the terms or phrases within the brackets. The choices are separated by forward slash marks. Alternative letters or phrases may also be indicated by the use of brackets. For example, “county[ies]” indicates a choice between the words “county” and “counties.” In a bracketed statement such as “[name of accomplice],” the user is to substitute the name of the accomplice rather than retaining the bracketed material verbatim. Material such as “[include if applicable: . . .]” and “[describe purpose]” provides guidelines for completing the finished jury instruction and should not be retained verbatim in the document.

   
   

   4. Use of masculine gender. For simplicity, the jury instructions in this product use masculine pronouns. These pronouns are not enclosed in brackets, but the user should, when drafting jury instructions for a particular case, replace the pronouns with feminine versions wherever appropriate. The jury instructions in this product do, however, use disjunctive pairs of masculine and feminine pronouns when the identity of a person will not be known at the time the instructions are given to the jury (for example, “have your foreperson sign his or her name”).

4. Comments and Citations of Authority

   
   

   The discussions and comments accompanying each jury instruction provide a ready reference to the law that serves as a foundation for the instruction. The primary authorities cited in this product are the Texas Penal Code, the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and Texas case law.

5. Using the Pattern Jury Charges

   
   

   For general guidelines on drafting a criminal jury charge, refer to the section titled “Quick Guide to Drafting a Jury Charge,” which follows this introduction. For matters specific to any instruction, refer to the commentary in chapter 1, any general commentary that begins the chapter containing the instruction in question, and the commentary specific to and following the instruction itself. Finally, preparation of a proper charge requires careful legal analysis and sound judgment.

6. Future Revisions

   
   

   The contents of the jury instructions depend on the underlying substantive law relevant to the case. The Committee expects to publish updates as needed to reflect changes and new developments in the law.

Quick Guide to Drafting a Jury Charge

The Main Charge

• Examine the indictment to determine the relevant Texas Penal Code provisions.
• Compare the language of the offense or offenses charged in the indictment with the language of the relevant Penal Code provisions. In general, the indictment should track the statutory language, alleging all the elements of a particular offense or offenses.
• For each count in the indictment, determine what the elements of the offense are. Even if the indictment does not allege all the elements of an offense, the jury charge must do so. If the indictment alleges more than the Penal Code provision requires, it may be possible to omit the unnecessary language in the jury charge.
• With few exceptions, all offenses require both forbidden conduct and one or more culpable mental states. Some offenses also require a certain result—for example, homicide, which requires that the defendant's conduct cause a result, death (see Tex. Penal Code § 19.01). Still other offenses include a circumstance surrounding conduct. For example, aggravated assault of a public servant under Tex. Penal Code § 22.02(b)(2)(B) requires that the person assaulted be a public servant, a circumstance surrounding conduct, as well as requiring the forbidden conduct and a proscribed result. For each offense you submit to the jury, then, you must ask:
  1. What is the forbidden conduct?
  2. Does the offense require a certain result?
  3. Does the offense include one or more circumstances surrounding conduct?
• Next determine what culpable mental states are required to commit the offense. A culpable mental state may be required as to conduct, a result, a circumstance surrounding conduct, or all these elements. For example, in the case of aggravated assault of a public servant, when bodily injury is alleged, the defendant must intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause a result, bodily injury. The statute also requires, however, that the state prove that the defendant knew the victim was a public servant—a circumstance surrounding conduct. In most cases, the statutory provision itself will indicate which culpable mental states apply, but sometimes case law will dictate that a culpable mental state not expressly included in the statute is also required. Finally, you must be careful to confine each culpable mental state to the element to which it applies. For example, in the case of injury to a child, the relevant culpable mental states apply to the result, not the conduct (see Tex. Penal Code § 22.04(a); Haggins v. State, 785 S.W.2d 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)).
• Many offenses may be committed in more than one statutory manner. For example, injury to a child may be committed by either an affirmative act—for example, hitting the child—or by an omission—for example, failing to provide medical care (see Tex. Penal Code § 22.04(a)). For each offense in the indictment, you must ask whether the state has alleged alternative statutory theories of how the offense was committed. If so, you will submit these theories to the jury in the disjunctive. The jurors must be unanimous that the state has proved the offense, but they need not be unanimous about the specific statutory manner. Do not, however, submit a theory to the jury if it (1) is not alleged in the indictment or (2) is not supported by the evidence adduced at trial.
• Other offenses define distinct statutory acts or results, and the jury must be unanimous on the specific act or result. For example, simple assault may be committed by causing bodily injury or by threatening another with imminent bodily injury (see Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1), (2)). These are separate and distinct criminal acts, so the jury must be unanimous about which act the defendant committed. You should not submit these acts in the disjunctive unless you also inform the jury that it must be unanimous about one specific act.
• If the indictment contains multiple counts, determine whether the state is seeking a conviction on each count or has alleged them in the alternative—for example, capital murder under Tex. Penal Code § 19.03 in the first count and murder under Tex. Penal Code § 19.02 in the second count. The jury must not be allowed to convict the defendant for two offenses when one is a lesser included offense of the other.
• Determine which unanimity instruction to give. In general, the rule is that when the state is alleging that the defendant committed one offense in one of two or more ways, the jury need not be unanimous—for example, sexual assault by penetration with the penis or a finger. In contrast, when the state is alleging that the defendant committed one of two or more acts, each of which could constitute a separate offense, the jury must be unanimous as to which act was committed—for example, sexual assault by penetration of the sexual organ or the anus of the victim (see Tex. Penal Code § 22.011(a)(1)(A)).

Defensive Matters and Lesser Included Offenses

• On request, determine if any defenses or affirmative defenses apply in the case. If so, include them, taking care to explain to the jury which party has the burden of proof.
• On request, determine if any lesser included offense instructions should be given. Ask the party who is requesting the lesser included offense instruction to explain what evidence raises that instruction.

Use of Evidence Instructions and Special Instructions

• On request, give a limiting instruction if extraneous offenses or bad acts have been introduced. Be careful to specifically identify the particular purpose for which the evidence was offered. Do not give a laundry-list instruction—for example, “intent, knowledge, scheme, plan, opportunity, or motive.”
• Determine if any special instructions, such as an instruction on accomplice witnesses or on the law of parties, should be given.
• Determine if any special issue instructions, such as a deadly weapon finding, should be included in the guilt/innocence phase instructions.

Putting the Charge Together

• Give general instructions to be included in every case and, if applicable, an instruction on the defendant's failure to testify.
• If multiple defendants are on trial, give a complete set of instructions for each defendant.
• Attach appropriate verdict forms. There should be one verdict form for each separate count or indictment that is submitted to the jury.
• Submit the proposed charge to each party for objections or special requests and modify the charge if appropriate.