12.9 General
Comments—Good Conduct Time and Parole Instructions—Section 3g Offenses
and Deadly Weapon Findings
Comment
Section 4 of article 37.07 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure mandates specific jury instructions on good conduct time
and/or parole for three different types of cases. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.07,
§ 4(a)–(c). Section
4(a) sets out an instruction for several situations. These include
certain organized criminal activity offenses, offenses listed in
article 42A.054(a), and, with some exceptions, cases in which “the
judgment contains an affirmative finding [of use of a deadly weapon]
under Article 42A.054(c) or (d).” Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.07,
§ 4(a).
The manner in which the punishment stage instructions deal
with the last situation depends on how the deadly weapon matter
is submitted to the jury. If the issue is submitted at punishment,
the jury instructions must include multiple versions of the good conduct
time and parole law, one for consideration if the deadly weapon
finding is made and the others for use if the finding is not made.
A plurality opinion of the court of criminal appeals has described
submission at the guilt stage as the better practice. Hill v. State, 913
S.W.2d 581, 586 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (plurality opinion). See
also Olivas v. State, 202
S.W.3d 137, 142 n.9 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (court of
appeals’ holding that submission of deadly weapon issue at guilt
was improper was not before court of criminal appeals, “but we note
that the deadly weapon issue has been submitted in this manner in
other cases”).
The Committee agrees that the deadly weapon issue is better
submitted to the jury at the guilt stage of the trial. This considerably
simplifies the punishment stage instruction.
Awkwardly, section 4(a) requires submission of the instructions
set out in that provision if the deadly weapon finding is contained
in the judgment. Of course, the judge must decide the content of
the punishment stage instructions before the judgment is drafted.
If the jury’s action in the guilt stage constitutes a deadly weapon
finding, which the judge will be required to include in the judgment,
the punishment stage instruction should include the section 4(a)
language.
Some instructions for individual offenses contain multiple
options. One is for cases in which either the offense of which the
defendant was convicted is an article 42A.054(a) offense or in which
the judge has decided to include a deadly weapon finding in the
judgment. The others are for other cases.
Comment
Section 4 of article 37.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure mandates specific jury instructions on good conduct time and/or parole for three different types of cases. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.07, § 4(a)–(c). Section 4(a) sets out an instruction for several situations. These include certain organized criminal activity offenses, offenses listed in article 42A.054(a), and, with some exceptions, cases in which “the judgment contains an affirmative finding [of use of a deadly weapon] under Article 42A.054(c) or (d).” Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.07, § 4(a).
The manner in which the punishment stage instructions deal with the last situation depends on how the deadly weapon matter is submitted to the jury. If the issue is submitted at punishment, the jury instructions must include multiple versions of the good conduct time and parole law, one for consideration if the deadly weapon finding is made and the others for use if the finding is not made. A plurality opinion of the court of criminal appeals has described submission at the guilt stage as the better practice. Hill v. State, 913 S.W.2d 581, 586 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (plurality opinion). See also Olivas v. State, 202 S.W.3d 137, 142 n.9 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (court of appeals’ holding that submission of deadly weapon issue at guilt was improper was not before court of criminal appeals, “but we note that the deadly weapon issue has been submitted in this manner in other cases”).
The Committee agrees that the deadly weapon issue is better submitted to the jury at the guilt stage of the trial. This considerably simplifies the punishment stage instruction.
Awkwardly, section 4(a) requires submission of the instructions set out in that provision if the deadly weapon finding is contained in the judgment. Of course, the judge must decide the content of the punishment stage instructions before the judgment is drafted. If the jury’s action in the guilt stage constitutes a deadly weapon finding, which the judge will be required to include in the judgment, the punishment stage instruction should include the section 4(a) language.
Some instructions for individual offenses contain multiple options. One is for cases in which either the offense of which the defendant was convicted is an article 42A.054(a) offense or in which the judge has decided to include a deadly weapon finding in the judgment. The others are for other cases.