15.20 Comment on Solicitation
of Another to Induce Someone Else to Commit Offense
Comment
In situations in which the state’s theory is
that the defendant solicited another to find a third party to commit
the intended offense, the solicitation is likely to be aimed at
conduct that would not constitute the commission of the intended
offense by the party solicited. However, it would make the solicited
party a party to that offense.
An indictment in such a case might provide as follows:
INDICTMENT: Don Defendant on or about February 29, 2015,
did then and there with intent that a capital felony be committed,
namely, capital murder, request, command, and attempt to induce
Iris Intermediary to engage in specific conduct, namely, to induce
another, Harvey Hitman, to intentionally and knowingly cause the
death of Victor Victim for remuneration or the promise of remuneration
that, under the circumstances surrounding Harvey Hitman’s conduct
as Don Defendant believed them to be, would make Harvey Hitman a
party to the commission of capital murder.
The instruction given at CPJC 15.21 provides for submission only on this theory.
Comment
In situations in which the state’s theory is that the defendant solicited another to find a third party to commit the intended offense, the solicitation is likely to be aimed at conduct that would not constitute the commission of the intended offense by the party solicited. However, it would make the solicited party a party to that offense.
An indictment in such a case might provide as follows:
The instruction given at CPJC 15.21 provides for submission only on this theory.