Main MenuMain MenuBookmark PageBookmark Page

Chapter 81

Chapter 81

Controlled Substance Offenses

81.15  Instruction—Possession of Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver

LAW SPECIFIC TO THIS CASE

The state accuses the defendant of having committed the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver it.

Relevant Statutes

A person commits the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver it if the person knowingly possesses with intent to deliver a controlled substance [and the amount of the controlled substance is, by aggregate weight, including adulterants or dilutants, [insert specific amount, e.g., one gram or more but less than four grams]].

[Substance] is a controlled substance.

Definitions

Possession

“Possession” means actual care, custody, control, or management.

Deliver

“Deliver” means to transfer, actually or constructively, to another a controlled substance [regardless of whether there is an agency relationship]. The term includes offering to sell a controlled substance.

Adulterant or Dilutant

“Adulterant or dilutant” means any material that increases the bulk or quantity of a controlled substance, regardless of its effect on the chemical activity of the controlled substance.

Knew He Was Possessing Controlled Substance

The phrase knew he was possessing a controlled substance means a person was aware that he was possessing something and aware that what he was possessing was a substance that in fact was a controlled substance.

Intended to Deliver Controlled Substance

The phrase intended to deliver a controlled substance means it was the person’s conscious objective or desire to deliver something and the person knew that the thing he so intended to deliver was a substance that in fact was a controlled substance.

Application of Law to Facts

[Include the following if the offense does not require a minimum weight.]

You must decide whether the state has proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, three elements. These elements are that—

  1. the defendant, [name], possessed [substance] in [county] County, Texas, on or about [date]; and
  2. the defendant knew he was possessing a controlled substance; and
  3. the defendant intended to deliver the controlled substance.

[Include the following if the offense requires a minimum weight.]

You must decide whether the state has proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, four elements. The elements are that—

  1. the defendant, [name], possessed [substance] in [county] County, Texas, on or about [date]; and
  2. the [substance] was, by aggregate weight, including adulterants or dilutants, [amount] gram[s] or more; and
  3. the defendant knew he was possessing a controlled substance; and
  4. the defendant intended to deliver the controlled substance.
  5. [Continue with the following.]

You must all agree on [elements 1, 2, and 3/elements 1, 2, 3, and 4] listed above.

If you all agree the state has failed to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, one or more of elements [1, 2, and 3/1, 2, 3, and 4] listed above, you must find the defendant “not guilty.”

If you all agree the state has proved each of the [three/four] elements listed above, you must find the defendant “guilty.”

[Insert any other instructions raised by the evidence. Then continue with the verdict form found in CPJC 2.1, the general charge.]

Comment

Delivery of a controlled substance in Penalty Group 1 is prohibited by and defined in Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.112. Delivery of a controlled substance in Penalty Group 2 is prohibited by and defined in Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.113. Delivery of a controlled substance in Penalty Group 3 or 4 is prohibited by and defined in Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.114. The definition of “deliver” is based on Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.002(8). The definition of “adulterant or dilutant” is based on Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.002(49). The definition of “possession” is from Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.002(38) and Tex. Penal Code § 1.07(a)(39).

Voluntariness Requirement Language. The voluntariness requirement language is included in the instruction at CPJC 81.8 in this chapter only. It could, of course, be modified and incorporated into the above instruction if the issue of voluntariness is raised. See also the voluntary possession comment at CPJC 81.7.

If modifying this instruction to include the voluntariness requirement language, be certain to also incorporate, at the appropriate locations, the additional element the state must prove and to alter any supporting language (for example, changing “You must all agree on elements 1, 2, 3, and 4 listed above” to “You must all agree on elements 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 listed above”).